Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Investigation of relative risk estimates from studies of the same population with contrasting response rates and designs

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Nicole Mealing
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elaine McColl
28 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Picavet
19 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Nicole Mealing
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elaine McColl
11 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Picavet
22 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Nicole Mealing
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Picavet
26 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Nicole Mealing
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
1 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
1 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-26

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement