From: A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization
p 1 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.700 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p 2 | 0.300 | 0.500 | 0.700 | 0.900 | 0.500 | 0.700 | 0.900 | 0.700 | 0.900 | 0.900 |
R Wald /R Neyman | 0.396 | 0.375 | 0.396 | 0.500 | 0.478 | 0.500 | 0.604 | 0.522 | 0.625 | 0.604 |
R Risk | 0.337 | 0.250 | 0.179 | 0.100 | 0.396 | 0.300 | 0.179 | 0.396 | 0.250 | 0.337 |
R Odds /R Chisq | 0.604 | 0.625 | 0.604 | 0.500 | 0.522 | 0.500 | 0.396 | 0.478 | 0.375 | 0.396 |
R LLR | 0.534 | 0.538 | 0.528 | 0.500 | 0.507 | 0.500 | 0.472 | 0.493 | 0.462 | 0.466 |
R RSIHR | 0.366 | 0.309 | 0.274 | 0.250 | 0.436 | 0.396 | 0.366 | 0.458 | 0.427 | 0.469 |
R RPW /R DL | 0.438 | 0.357 | 0.250 | 0.100 | 0.417 | 0.300 | 0.125 | 0.375 | 0.167 | 0.250 |