Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Development and validation of self-reported line drawings for assessment of knee malalignment and foot rotation: a cross-sectional comparative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Feb 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Ingham
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Reijman
24 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serge Poiraudeau
29 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Ingham
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Reijman
7 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachelle Buchbinder
15 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Ingham
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Ingham
Resubmission - Version 6
16 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
18 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-57

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement