Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Mar 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alaa Alkerwi
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leoné Malan
4 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evangelos Polychronopoulos
8 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dag Steinar Thelle
20 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pascal Bovet
5 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alaa Alkerwi
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dag Steinar Thelle
23 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pascal Bovet
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alaa Alkerwi
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
3 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alaa Alkerwi
Resubmission - Version 7
3 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
7 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
7 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-80

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement