Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: A simulation study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 May 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chung-Min Liao
13 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jens Klotsche
12 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - William Reichmann
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jens Klotsche
27 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chung-Min Liao
1 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - William Reichmann
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - William Reichmann
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - William Reichmann
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
29 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - William Reichmann
Resubmission - Version 7
29 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
5 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
5 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement