Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugene Demidenko
7 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cheryl Addy
17 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Lunt
26 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
7 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Vickers
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugene Demidenko
12 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
22 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cheryl Addy
8 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Vickers
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
18 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Vickers
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Vickers
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Vickers
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
28 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-13

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement