Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patriek Mistiaen
24 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Bower
30 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tamar Pincus
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patriek Mistiaen
4 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Bower
5 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Tamar Pincus
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Tamar Pincus
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Tamar Pincus
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
31 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement