Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessing smoking status in disadvantaged populations: is computer administered self report an accurate and acceptable measure?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jun 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Javors
11 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonio Molina
2 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jamie Bryant
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonio Molina
12 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Javors
7 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jamie Bryant
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jamie Bryant
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 Nov 2011 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-153

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement