Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Methodological issues associated with collecting sensitive information over the telephone - experience from an Australian non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) prevalence study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Gutierrez
30 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - janis whitlock
10 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Anne Taylor
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - janis whitlock
28 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anne Taylor
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anne Taylor
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
17 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-20

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement