Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparing methods to estimate treatment effects on a continuous outcome in multicentre randomized controlled trials: A simulation study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 May 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Pickering
18 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Legrand
31 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Valerii Fedorov
19 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Rong Chu
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Rong Chu
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Legrand
19 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Pickering
5 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rong Chu
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rong Chu
Resubmission - Version 6
18 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
21 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement