Skip to main content

Open Peer Review Reports for: Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker
21 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
14 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jeppe Bennekou Schroll
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker
3 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
13 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jeppe Bennekou Schroll
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jeppe Bennekou Schroll
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
24 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-22

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement