Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Meta-regression models to address heterogeneity and inconsistency in network meta-analysis of survival outcomes

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
11 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicky Welton
15 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ralf Bender
30 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jeroen Paul Jansen
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jeroen Paul Jansen
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicky Welton
7 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ralf Bender
9 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jeroen Paul Jansen
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
8 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-152

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement