Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of approaches to estimate confidence intervals of post-test probabilities of diagnostic test results in a nested case-control study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
5 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yongsong Qin
16 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Miodrag Bolic
17 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joao Andre Carrico
13 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Bas van Zaane
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joao Andre Carrico
15 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Curran-Everett
20 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Bas van Zaane
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
31 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-166

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement