Comparison of approaches to estimate confidence intervals of post-test probabilities of diagnostic test results in a nested case-control study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yongsong Qin|
|16 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Miodrag Bolic|
|17 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joao Andre Carrico|
|13 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Bas van Zaane|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joao Andre Carrico|
|15 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Douglas Curran-Everett|
|20 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Bas van Zaane|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|31 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-166|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.