Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A framework for organizing and selecting quantitative approaches for benefit-harm assessment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michele Shaffer
11 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Sepucha
23 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Milo Puhan
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Sepucha
7 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Milo Puhan
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
2 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
19 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-173

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement