Systematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility algorithm
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Ospina|
|17 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Donna Helene Odierna|
|13 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Vivian Welch|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Ospina|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|19 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-187|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.