Skip to main content

Table 3 Number (%) of authors (n=166) whose authorship statement could not be matched to ICMJE criteria for authorship

From: Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal

Stated contribution

No. (%) of authors*

Substantial/direct contribution

94 (56.6)

“Yes”

9 (5.4)

This (case) is interesting

8 (4.8)

We work/collaborate together

8 (4.8)

I am a specialist of/I work in the department for

7 (4.2)

“I am interested in this topic/field”

6 (3.6)

“It was my master degree thesis”

3 (1.8)

“The study carries scientific value”

3 (1.8)

Literature search

3 (1.8)

“I have participated sufficiently to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content”

3 (1.8)

Chief of the project/department

3 (1.8)

Supervisor

2 (1.2)

Coordinator

2 (1.2)

Bibliographical search, administrative and logistic support

2 (1.2)

“I have other related publications as a biostatistician“

2 (1.2)

Signature of the author

2 (1.2)

“My participation in the contribution was administrative and technical support.”

1 (0.6)

“I was responsible for translation of the article.”

1 (0.6)

“I have especially taken part in collecting the literature data, translation.”

1 (0.6)

“This is the first study of its kind.”

1 (0.6)

“On the basis of operational practice and clinical experience which led to this work.”

1 (0.6)

“Because I want to present process of treatment in our institute.”

1 (0.6)

“I am an investigator in scientific project with similar problems.”

1 (0.6)

“Because I believe this is a proper treatment in this situation.”

1 (0.6)

“I was scientific consultant of this research”

1 (0.6)

  1. *Percentages do not add up to 100 because of rounding.