Skip to main content

Table 3 Convergent validity of WHOQOL-BREF

From: Quality of life of Chinese urban community residents: a psychometric study of the mainland Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF

 

Dimension

 

Physical

Psychological

Social relationship

Environmental

Item Convergencea

4/7

5/6

3/3

8/8

Item Discriminant/Convergent Validityb

    

   (i) Intrascale item-corrected total correlations

mean correlations

0.39

0.50

0.53

0.48

median correlations

0.41

0.45

0.53

0.50

Range

0.44

0.40

0.01

0.12

   (ii) Interscale item-total correlations

mean correlations

0.29

0.37

0.40

0.31

median correlations

0.34

0.36

0.40

0.30

Range

0.61

0.35

0.15

0.36

Correlations among Domainsc

    

   Physical Domain

1

   

   Psychological Domain

0.53(0.57,0.70,0.71)

1

  

   Social relationship Domain

0.47(0.55,0.61,0.53)

0.52(0.60,0.73,0.73)

1

 

   Environmental Domain

0.40(0.54,0.72,0.57)

0.58(0.59,0.76,0.72)

0.50(0.61,0.71,0.65)

1

  1. aThe ratio of items to corrected-total correlated (i.e., item to corrected-total correlation) > 0.40
  2. bFor example, for the Physical Domain, 0.39 is the mean (whereas 0.41 is the median) of the 7 item-corrected total correlations for the 7 items within the Physical Domain; whereas 0.29 is the mean (0.34 is the median) of the 21 (7 × 3) correlations between the 7 items in the Physical Domain and the three other Domain scores
  3. cin brackets: Chinese data [35–37]