The quality of the evidence base for clinical pathway effectiveness: Room for improvement in the design of evaluation trials
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Jul 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Constance Fung|
|30 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch|
|28 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Rotter|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch|
|12 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Constance Fung|
|8 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Rotter|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-80|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.