Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The quality of the evidence base for clinical pathway effectiveness: Room for improvement in the design of evaluation trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jul 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Constance Fung
30 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
28 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Rotter
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
12 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Constance Fung
8 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Rotter
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
16 May 2012 Editorially accepted
18 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-80

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement