Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An item response theory evaluation of three depression assessment instruments in a clinical sample

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
31 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ira Bernstein
8 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lena Quilty
27 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Per Bech
31 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mats Adler
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ira Bernstein
26 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Per Bech
28 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lena Quilty
5 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mats Adler
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ira Bernstein
13 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mats Adler
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mats Adler
Resubmission - Version 5
15 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
6 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
21 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-84

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement