Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
18 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cathy Widom
20 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Reddy
1 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Abigail Norris Turner
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
9 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-34

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.