‘Trying to pin down jelly’ - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Carroll|
|25 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allison Tong|
|26 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karin Hannes|
|21 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Francine Toye|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allison Tong|
|24 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karin Hannes|
|25 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Francine Toye|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|21 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-13-46|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.