Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Teresa Henriques
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Teresa Henriques
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Josep Carrasco
20 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Shoukri
27 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Teresa Henriques
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Josep Carrasco
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
7 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
22 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-47

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement