More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Jan 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Feb 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antje Timmer|
|19 May 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Erik von Elm|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 May 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jun 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antje Timmer|
|4 Jul 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Erik von Elm|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Jul 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jul 2003||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jul 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-3-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.