Identifying null meta-analyses that are ripe for updating
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Apr 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Apr 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Eccles|
|9 May 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Sutton|
|6 Jun 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Barrowman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Jun 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Jul 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Eccles|
|15 Jul 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Sutton|
|21 Jul 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Barrowman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jul 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Jul 2003||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jul 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-3-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.