Skip to main content

Table 4 Absolute frequencies, outcome prevalences, exposure prevalences, crude and pooled prevalence ratio (PR) estimates, and relative confounding for the analysis of the modified data using asthma as the outcome, maternal smoking as the risk factor and social class as confounder (situation 2 modified).

From: Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio

First stratum: High social class

 

Asthma

No

All

 
 

N

Prev.

N

N

Exp. prev. = 26.6%

Mother smokes

21

14.6%

123

144

PR = 1.21

No

48

12.1%

350

398

M-H weight = 12.75

All

69

12.7%

473

542

 

Second stratum: Low social class

 

Asthma

No

All

 
 

N

Prev.

N

N

Exp. prev. = 43.3%

Mother smokes

194

68.1%

91

285

PR = 1.70

No

149

39.9%

224

373

M-H weight = 64.54

All

343

52.1%

315

658

 

Combined strata: High and low social class

 

Asthma

No

All

Exp. prev. = 35.8%

 

N

Prev.

N

N

PR (crude) = 1.96

Mother smokes

215

50.1%

214

429

PR (M-H) = 1.62

No

197

25.6%

574

771

Confounding = -17.3%

All

412

34.3%

788

1200

P-value(het)*= 0.2

  1. * P-value for testing heterogeneity of the prevalence ratios across strata.