Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Aug 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Aug 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Moher|
|5 Sep 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rob Scholten|
|23 Sep 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Simon French|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Sep 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rob Scholten|
|9 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Moher|
|12 Oct 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Simon French|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Oct 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Oct 2005||Editorially accepted|
|14 Oct 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-5-33|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.