Peer Review reports
From: Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
| 5 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rob Scholten |
| 23 Sep 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Simon French |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rob Scholten |
| 9 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
| 12 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Simon French |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Oct 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Oct 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-5-33 |
You can find further information about peer review here.