Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 May 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Jun 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - R Brian Haynes
16 Jun 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen Crumley
5 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - K Robinson
14 Sep 2005 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhang
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Sep 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Sep 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen Crumley
19 Sep 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - R Brian Haynes
5 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - K Robinson
30 Nov 2005 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhang
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Nov 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - R Brian Haynes
5 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - K Robinson
26 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhang
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Feb 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - K Robinson
2 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhang
Resubmission - Version 5
2 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Li Zhang
Resubmission - Version 6
8 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
9 May 2006 Editorially accepted
9 May 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-6-23

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement