Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 6 Optimal combinations of (n opt , k opt ) which minimize the variance of θ ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaaiiGacuWF4oqCgaqcaaaa@2E79@ for N = 24.

From: Interval estimation and optimal design for the within-subject coefficient of variation for continuous and binary variables

θ ρ
  0.6 0.7 0.8
  (n opt , k opt )
0.1 (6.77, 3.54) (5.63, 4.26) (4.54, 5.29)
0.2 (3.89, 6.17) (3.31, 7.24) (2.77, 8.67)
0.3 (2.91, 8.23) (2.54, 9.47) (2.17, 11.05)
0.4 (2.44, 9.82) (2.16, 11.12) (1.88, 12.74)