Skip to main content

Advertisement

Peer Review reports

From: Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects

Original Submission
19 Sep 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Pittler
11 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry
17 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Ashby
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Su Golder
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry
15 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Ashby
16 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Pittler
21 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Su Golder
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Su Golder
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
27 Jan 2006 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-6-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page