Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Methodological standards in non-inferiority AIDS trials: moving from adherence to compliance

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jan 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Snapinn
21 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gilda Piaggio
5 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Temple
9 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Jacques Parienti
Resubmission - Version 2
9 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Snapinn
25 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gilda Piaggio
12 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Temple
28 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Jacques Parienti
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Aug 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Jacques Parienti
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Aug 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Jacques Parienti
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Sep 2006 Editorially accepted
20 Sep 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-6-46

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement