Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessing differential attrition in clinical trials: self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation and type II diabetes

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Nov 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Decker Christensen
11 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mike Clarke
24 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Carl Heneghan
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Decker Christensen
23 Feb 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mike Clarke
27 Feb 2007 Author responded Author comments - Carl Heneghan
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Feb 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Carl Heneghan
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Carl Heneghan
Resubmission - Version 6
30 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
30 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Carl Heneghan
Resubmission - Version 7
30 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
2 May 2007 Editorially accepted
2 May 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-7-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement