Peer Review reports
From: The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Mar 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 3 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel O'Connor |
| 5 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Hoerr |
| 10 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - fabrizio benedetti |
| 14 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Aisen |
| 24 Apr 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - James Warner |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 24 Apr 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 May 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Hoerr |
| 8 May 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - fabrizio benedetti |
| 14 May 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel O'Connor |
| 15 May 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Aisen |
| 1 Jul 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - James Warner |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Jul 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Jul 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-7-30 |
You can find further information about peer review here.