Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessing the order of magnitude of outcomes in single-arm cohorts through systematic comparison with corresponding cohorts: An example from the AMOS study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jul 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sunita Vohra
15 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Weidenhammer
10 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Harald Johan Hamre
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Harald Johan Hamre
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Weidenhammer
21 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sunita Vohra
18 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Harald Johan Hamre
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Harald Johan Hamre
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
19 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement