Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The impact of consent on observational research: a comparison of outcomes from consenters and non consenters to an observational study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Sep 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Don Willison
21 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rustam Al-Shahi Salman
21 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Una Macleod
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Don Willison
25 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Una Macleod
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Don Willison
1 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Una Macleod
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
3 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement