Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Nov 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Thomas
22 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosaline Barbour
28 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Salla Atkins
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Salla Atkins
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Salla Atkins
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
16 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
16 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement