Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of two dependent within subject coefficients of variation to evaluate the reproducibility of measurement devices

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Dec 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Juan de Dios Luna del Castillo
6 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Josep Carrasco
18 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Bonett
21 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Markus Neuhäuser
19 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Mohamed Shoukri
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Josep Carrasco
10 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Markus Neuhäuser
16 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Mohamed Shoukri
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Mohamed Shoukri
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
22 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-24

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement