Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: The Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Gulliford
23 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Campbell
4 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Lehana Thabane
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Gulliford
9 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Campbell
2 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Lehana Thabane
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Campbell
10 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Lehana Thabane
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
16 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-37

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement