Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Determining the date of diagnosis – is it a simple matter? The impact of different approaches to dating diagnosis on estimates of delayed care for ovarian cancer in UK primary care

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Jan 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Hamilton
6 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Neal
11 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Yawn
17 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shane Pascoe
27 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Corinne de Vries
31 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anne Tate
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Hamilton
23 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shane Pascoe
18 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anne Tate
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
23 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-42

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement