Determining the date of diagnosis – is it a simple matter? The impact of different approaches to dating diagnosis on estimates of delayed care for ovarian cancer in UK primary care
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Jan 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Hamilton|
|6 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Neal|
|11 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Yawn|
|17 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shane Pascoe|
|27 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Corinne de Vries|
|31 Mar 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Tate|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 Mar 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Apr 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Hamilton|
|23 Apr 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shane Pascoe|
|18 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Tate|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Jun 2009||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jun 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-9-42|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.