Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review

Original Submission
9 Mar 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Rodgers
21 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen J Smith
21 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosaline Barbour
11 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen J Smith
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
10 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 9
10 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
11 Aug 2009 Editorially accepted
11 Aug 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page