Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sayan Dasgupta
21 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mussie Akalu
23 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Feng Gao
6 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Patrick Royston
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Feng Gao
20 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mussie Akalu
25 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sayan Dasgupta
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Jan 2016 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0110-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement