Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The quality and diagnostic value of open narratives in verbal autopsy: a mixed-methods analysis of partnered interviews from Malawi

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Prabhat Jha
16 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Enid Schatz
24 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allysha Robinson
25 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Carina King
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Carina King
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Carina King
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Jan 2016 Editorially accepted
1 Feb 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0115-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement