Skip to main content

Table 2 Systematic review methods of therapeutic meta-analyses published in 2013 and including non-randomized studies (n = 188)

From: Meta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological review

Characteristic

Included NRSI only

Included NRSI&RCTs

All Meta-analyses

(n = 69)

(n = 119)

(n = 188)

No (%)

No (%)

No (%)

Search strategy

   

No. of electronic databases searched, median [IQR]

3 [24]

3 [3, 4]

3 [3, 4]

  > 2 databases searched

51 (74)

96 (81)

147 (78)

Electronic databases searcheda

   

 Medline/PubMed/Ovid

69 (100)

118 (99)

187 (99)

 EMBASE

52 (75)

97 (82)

149 (79)

 Cochrane

45 (65)

81 (68)

126 (67)

 Web of science/web of knowledge

14 (20)

22 (18)

36 (19)

Time-frame of search strategy reported

62 (90)

109 (92)

171 (91)

Time end of search-publication date (months), median [min-max]

10 [0–24]

9 [1–51]

10 [0–51]

Search strategy provided for at least one database

18 (26)

44 (37)

62 (33)

Searched reference lists for relevant studies

57 (83)

105 (88)

162 (86)

Hand searched journals

5 (7)

7 (6)

12 (6)

Searched for grey literaturea

23 (33)

49 (41)

72 (38)

 Conference abstracts

14 (20)

27 (23)

41 (22)

 Registries (eg, ClinicalTrials.gov)

8 (12)

25 (21)

33 (18)

 Experts

6 (9)

9 (8)

15 (8)

No restriction by language reported

20 (29)

62 (52)

82 (44)

Study selection

   

Duplicate study selection

47 (68)

84 (71)

131 (70)

Methodological quality/risk of bias

   

Assessment of MQ/RoB

47 (68)

88 (74)

135 (72)

Tools used for RCTsa

   

 Cochrane RoB Tool [41]

NA

42 (35)

NA

 Jadad scale [42]

NA

22 (18)

NA

 GRADE [43]

NA

9 (8)

NA

 Other

NA

21 (18)

NA

 Authors made their own tool

NA

3 (3)

NA

 Unclear

NA

7 (6)

NA

Tools used for NRSIa

   

 Newcastle-Ottawa scale [44]

25 (36)

43 (36)

68 (36)

 GRADE [43]

5 (7)

8 (7)

13 (7)

 Cochrane RoB Tool [41]

3 (4)

7 (6)

10 (5)

 Other tools

13 (19)

24 (20)

37 (20)

 Authors made their own tool

6 (9)

6 (5)

12 (6)

 Unclear

3 (4)

9 (8)

12 (6)

Confounding taken into account in risk of bias

13 (19)

20 (17)

33 (18)

Same tool used for RCTs and NRSI

NA

27 (23)

NA

Duplicate MQ/RoB assessment

30/47 (64)

57/88 (65)

87/135 (64)

Data extraction

   

 Duplicate data extraction

52 (75)

86 (72)

138 (73)

 Contact authors for clarification or additional results

18 (26)

43 (36)

61 (32)

  1. Data are no. (%), unless indicated. IQR interquartile range; MQ methodological quality; NRSI non-randomized studies of interventions; RCTs randomized controlled trials; Cochrane RoB Cochrane risk of bias tool; NA Not applicable
  2. aMore than one item could have been reported for each meta-analysis