Skip to main content

Table 3 Meta-analysis methods of therapeutic meta-analyses published in 2013 and including non-randomized studies (n = 188)

From: Meta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological review

Characteristic

Included NRSI only

Included NRSI&RCTs

All meta-analyses

(n = 69)

(n = 119)

(n = 188)

No (%)

No (%)

No (%)

Studies combined

   

Type of studies included

   

 Only prospective cohort studies

2 (3)

3 (3)

5 (3)

 Only cohort studies

18 (26)

34 (29)

52 (28)

 Including also case–control studies

18 (26)

28 (23)

46 (24)

 Including all types of NRSI

5 (7)

18 (15)

23 (12)

 Other

28 (41)

39 (33)

67 (36)

 “Observational studies”

6 (9)

22 (18)

28 (15)

 “Prospective and retrospective studies”

11 (16)

12 (10)

23 (12)

 “Retrospective studies”

11 (16)

5 (4)

16 (9)

Did not clearly report design for each study

43 (62)

87 (73)

130 (69)

Meta-analysis combining results of NRSI and RCTs

NA

88 (74)

NA

 Results also presented separately

NA

44/88 (50)

NA

Meta-analysis combining studies of different designs

39 (57)

61 (51)

100 (53)

Meta-analysis model

   

Network meta-analysis

0

2 (2)

2 (1)

Crude or adjusted estimates used

   

 Combined crude and adjusted estimates

10 (14)

12 (10)

22 (12)

 Adjusted

8 (12)

13 (11)

21 (11)

 Both crude and adjusted estimates separately

4 (6)

4 (3)

8 (4)

 Crude

2 (3)

4 (3)

6 (3)

 Not reported/unclear

45 (65)

86 (72)

131 (70)

If adjusted, list of confounding factors

15/22 (68)

19/29 (66)

34/51 (67)

Type of model

   

 Random-effects model

39 (57)

56 (47)

95 (50)

 Fixed-effects model, unless high heterogeneity, then random-effects model

19 (28)

33 (28)

52 (28)

 Both fixed- and random-effects models

5 (7)

21 (18)

26 (14)

 Fixed-effects model

3 (4)

6 (5)

9 (5)

 Not reported/unclear

3 (4)

3 (3)

6 (3)

Heterogeneity assessment & exploration

   

Heterogeneity assesseda

66 (96)

116 (97)

182 (97)

 I2

57 (83)

107 (90)

164 (87)

 Cochran Q χ2 test

41 (59)

74 (62)

115 (61)

 τ2

4 (6)

2 (2)

6 (3)

Heterogeneity exploreda

54 (82)

103 (87)

157 (84)

 Meta-regression analysis

13 (19)

21 (18)

34 (18)

 Subgroup analysis

44 (64)

82 (69)

126 (67)

 Sensitivity analysis

35 (51)

74 (62)

109 (58)

Reporting bias assessmenta

49 (71)

78 (66)

127 (68)

 Standard funnel plot

41 (59)

70 (59)

111 (59)

 Egger’s test

32 (46)

36 (30)

68 (36)

 Begg’s test

18 (26)

24 (20)

42 (22)

Among MAs with ≥10 studies, reporting bias assessed

24/29 (83)

58/76 (76)

82/105 (78)

  1. MAs meta-analyses; NRSI non-randomized studies of intervention; RCTs randomized controlled trials
  2. aMore than one item could have been reported for each meta-analysis