Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Median recall analysis for each database in descending order

From: Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews – are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?

No. in descending order Databases Median (IQR)
1–3 MEDLINE + EMBASE + CENTRAL 88.9% (81.6–100%)
4 SCOPUS 85.7% (61.8–100%)
5 HealthSTAR 83.3% (62.4–89.4%)
6 Web of Science 55.6% (1.8–79.3%)
7 CINAHL 14.3% (1.9–40%)
8 MANTIS 12.5% (2.9–16.6%)
9 PEdro 0% (0–20.7%)
10 SportDISCUS 0% (0–9.1%)
11 AMED 0% (0–7.7%)
12 PsychINFO 0% (0–0%)
13 OT-seeker 0% (0–0%)