Peer Review reports
From: Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Sep 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Oct 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hanna Tolonen |
24 Oct 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Christina Foldenauer |
1 Nov 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Judith Poldervaart |
8 Nov 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andreas Eiset |
8 Dec 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Martha Abshire |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Dec 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andreas Eiset |
26 Jan 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Martha Abshire |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 Jan 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Publishing | ||
11 Feb 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Feb 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.