Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What’s the uptake? Pragmatic RCTs may be used to estimate uptake, and thereby population impact of interventions, but better reporting of trial recruitment processes is needed

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catalin Tufanaru
17 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa Susan Wieland
30 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Katy Bell
Resubmission - Version 2
30 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa Susan Wieland
14 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catalin Tufanaru
3 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Merrick Zwarenstein
2 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Katy Bell
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa Susan Wieland
24 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Merrick Zwarenstein
15 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Katy Bell
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
22 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0443-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement