A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Page|
|27 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mhairi Campbell|
|21 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - clovis faggion|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Page|
|16 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - clovis faggion|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0453-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.