Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of reviews included in this study. Numbers in parenthesis are percentages

From: A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals

Characteristics

Systematic review

Narrative review

Clinically oriented (CO) issuea

73 (97)

168 (84)

PHPMb issue

2 (3)

32 (16)

Number of citations

5461

10,000

Methodology reported?

• Search

4 (5)

126 (63)

• Selection

0 (0)

0 (0)

• Extraction

0 (0)

0 (0)

• Quality assessment

0 (0)

0 (0)

• Search + selection

0 (0)

0 (0)

• Search + quality assessment

1 (1.5)

0 (0)

• Search + selection + extraction

3 (4)

0 (0)

• Search + selection + quality assessment

4 (5)

0 (0)

• Search + extraction + quality assessment

1 (1.5)

0 (0)

• Search + selection + extraction + quality assessment

60 (80)

0 (0)

• No methodology reported

2 (3)

74 (37)

  1. aCO issue: any review intended to address the management of a clinical condition (including also any measure to prevent disease). It includes reviews analysing the effectiveness, side-effects of interventions or both, effectiveness of screening etc
  2. bPHPM issue: any review intended to generate hypotheses or facilitate discussion in the medical community