Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nikolaos Pandis
11 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Saldanha
3 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - GUOWEI LI
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nikolaos Pandis
6 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - GUOWEI LI
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - GUOWEI LI
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - GUOWEI LI
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
29 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0459-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement